I have nothing against series. If I've loved a story then often I'll want to return to that world. I just feel that each book should be whole and complete in itself. Write a book, conclude it and THEN decide to write another one. Some authors who do this well are Shannon Hale and Jaclyn Moriarty. Of course, some stories have too much plot for one book and need to be in a series. The author will have the whole series planned (I'll use Stephenie Meyer as my example here, though I've never read her books). So if it's not a series that I object to itself, it must be something else. A franchise maybe?
Maybe it's when I feel like an author hasn't written a book to satisfy the reader, they've deliberately NOT satisfied the reader to keep them coming back, to keep the mysteries. I want authors to create stories, not franchises. If those stories happen to connect, that's fine. Often the writing is good, they're enjoyable books, but they're blatantly a first-in-a-series and it's starting to drive me CRAZY. I don't want to be too judgemental as I know authors have to sell books to make their profits, but if the author doesn't love the book, how can they expect me, the reader, to? It isn't just the 'Adult' authors who do this, it's just that they seem to do it a lot. Because this is how 'Adult' series work or because they think teenage fiction is easy to write?
This isn't a slam on 'Adult' authors for trying to write teen fiction, I love it when they do. If I enjoy their book I'll check out their other books for adults. Just please make a story that has a beginning, middle, end. Over one book, over four, I don't really care (though Adult authors, if you're listening, I'd love to see some stand-alone teen books from you). But when all you put in is hook, hook, hook and never bother to conclude, I start to lose my faith in you.
So I have to ask this. As a reader, am I being selfish? Is it acceptable for an author to give you a set of books that are probably never going to conclude? Or is it because I am spoilt by the huge number of books in the teen market at the moment?
I agree with you completely! I don't like a series format that leaves you continuously with more questions than answers : books are different than tv series, there can be so much time between two books! I didn't notice if it's a phenomenon that's more true of "Adult authors" than the usual YA authors, though.
ReplyDeleteI don't like never-ending series. I used to read those when I was younger, and they just kept going and going... Most of those books were self-contained, which almost seemed to make it worse; I got the feeling that they were only being churned out to make money, often at the expense of the writing or a decent plot. One of the reasons why I started reading the Harry Potter series was that I knew there were only going to be seven books. There was an end in sight, so I knew that there would be some resolution to most of the plot points. Had J.K. Rowling said, at some point, "I think I'm going to write another Harry Potter book... so who knows how long this series will go?", I would have abandoned it.
ReplyDeleteI have started so many series, I am wary of starting more...
ReplyDeletelove your blog. i love connecting with other reviewers, readers, and writers. i'm following you now. you should visit/follow mine. i have all things books...
ReplyDeletenice seeing you.
xo
I totally agree completely! It's nice having a series of books if they are planned and there is only a few in the series. Another culprit for this is Lemony Snicket with the Unfortunate Events series. Usually, if I start a series it puts pressure on me to read the whole thing, even if I don't want to. Fabulous post!
ReplyDeletexxx
Thankyou. I prefer books in a series to be able to stand alone. I like the connected-ness of it all, but when the each just feel like a chapter in a long winding tale its frustrating.
ReplyDelete